Families raising children with Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) and related neurobehavioral conditions face profound challenges that remain significantly under-researched and inconsistently addressed across systems of care.
This initiative exists to:
- Document lived experiences through structured data collection
- Identify systemic patterns in crisis response and service access
- Examine the intersection of disability, Medicaid obligations, and child welfare practices
- Advocate for evidence-based policy reforms, including Safe Harbor protections for families seeking emergency care
This work is grounded in data, not anecdote. Findings are compiled in aggregate and used to inform policy, oversight, and reform efforts at both the federal and state level.
Preliminary data collected across multiple states indicates consistent patterns of concern, including:
- Crisis-level behaviors posing safety risks to children, siblings, and caregivers
- Barriers to accessing medically necessary emergency and stabilization services
- Retaliatory or punitive system responses following good-faith help-seeking
- Inconsistent disclosure, preparation, and post-placement support in foster and adoption contexts
These patterns raise serious questions regarding disability discrimination, Medicaid compliance, and the legal treatment of families acting to protect safety.
We are conducting structured, voluntary, parent-reported surveys designed to capture:
- Crisis behaviors and safety risks
- System responses following emergency help-seeking
- Relational and family-wide impacts of severe attachment disorders
- Foster and adoption disclosure and preparation practices
All data is:
- Collected confidentially
- Reported only in aggregate
- Reviewed for consistency and pattern identification
- Used exclusively for research, policy analysis, and advocacy
Participation does not obligate families to legal action or public disclosure.
Documents crisis behaviors, safety risks, access to emergency and stabilization services, and system responses following help-seeking.
Examines coercive relational patterns, credibility harm, and impacts on siblings and caregivers.
Documents pre-placement disclosure, training, informed consent, and post-placement supports.
We are assembling a national advocacy and research team to support:
Data review and pattern analysis, Policy and legislative advocacy, State-level coordination, Research and documentation support. No legal or clinical background is required. Public storytelling is optional. Behind-the-scenes support is essential.